Ancient Philosophy and Aristotle.

Word Count: 2192 As Aristotle viewed the world rough him, he observed that intimacys ar moving and changing in genuine(prenominal) ways. Aristotle observed that certain things motive some otherwise things, which in turn reach aboutthing else. Aristotle believed that an non-finite chain of source was not possible, thus, a run aground operator of some kind must exist as the startle bugger off of everything that changes or becomes. The narrow-go evidence that Aristotle viewed was the world close to him. He observed that everything is in performance, and that one enquiry causes some other motion and so on. Much like billiard nuts on a pool table. One roll hits another lubber, that ball moves, hits a third ball, and the third ball moves. Like A causes B to move causes C to move etc. after careful observation, Aristotle noticed that everything is in motion, tear down the planets, and thus, at that place was a chain of spring. Aristotle believed that something can not come from nothing, that is, a thing can not gobble up in and out of existence, thus, there must either be an infinite chain of causation or a startle cause/prime mover. Aristotle dismiss the possibility of infinite causation and instead attempted to turf out that there is a prime mover or first cause. Aristotle also believed the universe of discourse was situated in a certain way.

Aristotle believed that the heavens began equitable supra the bottom of the moon and the everything above the lower percent of the moon wa s the heavens. In the heavens, Aristotle observed that everything was in a cyclical motion, and that the planets move! d about each other in circles. If the planets moved about in circular motion then there must have been a cause to bring about their motion, thus, there must also be either an infinite chain of causation for heavenly... If you want to expire a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay